That's partly why I primarily use Gmap4 now. I agree that most web applications offer lame map sizes and a bunch of clutter. For mapping and fitness, I use desktop applications. For web purposes, I am looking primarily at sharing. I also use a combination of web applications and desktop applications. I keep track of my fitness information, also, and maximum recording frequency is necessary to capture information on cadence and heart rate, especially. While I appreciate for mapping purposes, reducing the detail of a track file might work fine to still give you a good representation of where the trail goes, that's simply not an option for me. It's been running for months with nice results and I thought others here might find it useful since I use it mostly for mtb.Ĭlick to expand.Fair enough. When you go to any of fancy gps mapping websites you get a flood of bs that I don't even care about. I'm used to pouring through maps and all I ever see are just the maps. The reason I did so is because everything else I used had too much stuff I didn't want, like ads, too many options, cheesy map sizes, or whatever got in the way of a plain simple map. I only created it because I had all the pieces from other projects and spent a couple of hours gluing them together. This basic mapper is no improvement over anything out there. I've got some time to kill right now so I'll use it to respond to your message, I take it as constructive criticism anyway. Files can often be reduced to 1/10th the size without much loss of track detail. You can greatly improve gpx track logs in Garmin MapSource very easily. My mapper currently has no gpx filesize restriction but viewing the maps may be slow for very large files. Handling large gpx shouldn't be a big deal, most of the problems arise when trying to map such large track logs, it all runs on Google Maps in-browser JavaScript and it's pretty slow and wastes a lot of runtime memory even though they did a great job making it relatively efficient. The uploader currently ignores waypoints found in gpx files. You're also right in that it's wasn't made for others, it was made just for me, and made available to anyone who might find it useful in my opening post. It's been running for months with nice results and I thought others here might find it useful since I use it mostly for mtb. I would recommend as it is both lightweight and easy to use.Click to expand.I've got some time to kill right now so I'll use it to respond to your message, I take it as constructive criticism anyway. Typically, these programs will be free to use but some will require a quick installation. Just type GPX to KML converter into your search engine and you’ll receive plenty of results from which to choose. There is plenty of conversion software available to you online, which is likely the more convenient route to take. The best way to ensure that all data from a GPX file is properly imported into Google Maps is to first convert it to KML, Google’s preferred format. It will benefit you more in the end if you decide to convert the map file to KML yourself, prior to uploading it to Google Maps. However, there is still that possibility your GPX file was not fully converted by Google Maps and didn’t produce all of the necessary data. It seems simple enough, right? The process really is. ![]() Hit the Upload button and your map waypoints should be added to the new map, automatically. You can choose to do so or simply drag and drop the file directly into the area provided. An option to import the GPX file from your computer will present itself.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |